Post Match: Almost Enough in San Diego

A clash of Western Conference heavyweights ended in a stalemate, with Vancouver Whitecaps heading back home with a point away against San Diego FC in a cagey affair.

Neither side wanted a repeat of the eight-goal thriller at BC Place last month but the ‘Caps seemingly got the breakthrough they needed in the first half off of an own goal, forced by some excellent work from Sebastian Berhalter and Edier Ocampo. After a couple of big misses from Vancouver, San Diego got their equalizer to remain atop the West.

Jesper Sørensen opted to return to a more conventional approach after switching things up with five in the back in midweek. Instead, he returned to four defenders, slotting in Mathias Laborda as a left back to give Tate Robinson a rest. Andres Cubas returned to the lineup, slotting in alongside Jeevan Badwal and Berhalter. Brian White was flanked by Emmanuel Sabbi and Jayden Nelson.

White nearly struck seconds into the match, rounding Pablo Sisniega but was unable to direct his shot goalward from a tight angle. The chance, however, was a warning shot that Vancouver would seek to rely heavily on dangerous balls over the top, as they did in the midweek.

The ‘Caps opted to have a slightly higher line early, trying to trigger the press quickly to win the ball in a more advanced area, with Cubas given some license to get forward to be a bulldog and recover possession and use their pace in transition against a relatively makeshift San Diego backline.

While San Diego had the bulk of possession early, the ‘Caps were able to limit them to half chances, though the danger of the home side’s ball movement and the creativity of Andres Dreyer was ever present. Much of that threat came down the right hand side, with Dreyer and Oscar Verhoeven stretching Nelson and Laborda, especially as the Vancouver left back looked to push forward at times.

The big moment for Vancouver came at the halfway point of the first half, when Ranko Veselinovic fell down with a non-contact injury after trying to dribble upfield. It briefly looked like he might try to continue on but he was ultimately brought off for Belal Halbouni. The loss is even more painful as Tristan Blackmon inches back towards full fitness.

Ocampo really grew into things, ripping a powerful shot that could have been a goal and then, moments later, latching onto a beautiful through ball from Berhalter to force Sisniega into a save at full stretch. Laborda and White hovered on the back post, however, and forced the ball over the line to give Vancouver a 1-0 lead. The ball appeared to take a touch off Manu Duah before trickling over the line but the ‘Caps won’t care.

The second half opened with a burst of momentum for the home side, who forced Vancouver into some last ditch defending on a pair of set pieces. Slowly, things started to open up a bit and the ‘Caps found themselves on the back foot a bit. Sørensen elected to add Ralph Priso to try and stabilize things in the midfield.

The air went out of the game at the half hour mark, when Cubas was initially deemed to have handled the ball outside the area, though the offense seemed to take place in the box. The call seemed harsh, as Lozano plowed into him while his arm was pinned at his side. And, despite a VAR review, Alexis da Silva elected to reverse his foul call and deem Cubas to have had his arm in a natural position.

San Diego continued to look the more dangerous side, with the ‘Caps content to try and feed Sabbi and Nelson on the break, with only modest success. Nelson thought he was through on goal multiple times, only to be frustrated by the young San Diego centerback pairing.
But he seemingly did enough to create a second goal, with White left with an open net to hit after some liquid build up — but he somehow conspired to slide it just wide. It was a tight-ish angle but still a shocking miss, particularly from a striker of that quality.

San Diego took full advantage and their goal came off a set piece, which is where they found much of their joy in the second half. It was a broken corner in truth but a squibbed long shot found its way to Ian Pilcher, who smashed the shot past Takaoka. The ‘Caps will be disappointed to concede on a play where they should have cleared their lines better but it felt like an unlucky break as well.

Both sides had chances to grab all three points in the final ten minutes but both keepers were equal to them. The ‘Caps actually got a burst of energy to regain control of the match late and Daniel Rios had a shot to win it with the last kick of the evening but it was a strong save from Sisniega to keep things level.

Stray Thoughts

  • Credit to Bjorn Utvik and Belal Halbouni, who were thrust into action rather unceremoniously but held up quite well against one of the most dangerous attacking sides in the league. Both read things well and prevented the home side from doing much with their possession, aside from set pieces, where San Diego excelled.
  • Ocampo was rightly hooked at half time after he picked up a silly yellow, hacking down Chucky Lozano when he didn’t need to. Sørensen clearly didn’t want Lozano to go toe to toe with a guy on a booking. BUT I thought this was another nice performance from Ocampo and the ‘Caps suffered when he came off, as it meant they lacked another runner who could force San Diego into uncomfortable defensive decisions. Nelson and Sabbi were just too predictable in the second, by and large.
  • Brutal officiating display, epitomized by one of the silliest VAR checks you’ll ever see and a 20-2 foul disparity in favor of San Diego. I don’t think it cost Vancouver the game but it was frustrating to watch.
  • Man, we get spoiled by having Brian White up front but he does have one or two games a year where he forgets how to score and this was one of them. They were both from less than straightforward angles but if you give White two shots at an open net, you’d bet a lot of money that he’d hit one of them.
  • Nonetheless, a draw is probably a fair result. San Diego had the momentum for much of the second, until the end when the ‘Caps found their feet again. The home side had much of the possession, while Vancouver worked two open net chances they couldn’t finish. Those misses will haunt Vancouver but, while losing the lead is dispiriting, you’d probably take a point if offered at the start of the game. Both teams showed glimpses of why they are at the top of the Western Conference and both had moments where they looked tired and depleted. Hopefully we’ll see this matchup again in the playoffs with both sides at full strength.

Man of the Match

Berhalter feasted with the space San Diego seemed happy to provide him and that was even beyond the ball that opened things up for the first goal — he really was at the center of everything Vancouver did. Cubas was instrumental as well, particularly at the beginning when the midfield was overpowering San Diego and creating chances in transition. And Halbouni, Utvik and Takaoka deserve credit for holding things down at the back.

8 thoughts on “Post Match: Almost Enough in San Diego

  1. I thought the officiating was fine. That long VAR induced delay sucked but at the end it was the correct call. The mistake was in calling a foul in the 1st place, IMO. In the initial challenge both players were guilty of dangerous play and that the ball glanced off of Cubas’s arm should have been a non call. At the end of the game the referee added time beyond the minimum as the caps were in attack mode in and around the SD penalty area but once that passage of play is over then that’s it. The only thing that the referee could extend the time for would be a penalty, and probally a free kick as well. Again, no issues with the referee. The caps put in a pretty good performance. Good to see Halbouni getting action again. I think he’s a good player.

  2. The game was lost because there wasn’t a Vancouver player on the pitch who could put the ball in the net, including Brian White. The goal conceded to Vancouver was an own goal by San Diego player, Duah.

    Stop blaming losses on the officials. It seems after every game someone (or many someones) blame the loss on poor or lopsided refereeing. If enough goals are scored, even the worst officiating can be overcome.

    Nelson is so focused on running up the pitch as fast as possible, he fails to realize no one is running parallel to him so if he gets bogged down there’s no one to pass the ball to. So what happens? He loses possession in, or somewhere, near the box.

    I don’t know how Jesper does it.

    1. This was not a loss, and nobody ‘blamed’ the result on the officials. We (unlike other rabid fan bases) simply want a fair shake.

  3. it was bias referring- and TV coverage which probably had to do more with ignorance and incompetence- it was difficult to listen to – they couldnt figure out that the Cubas handball was because his arm was in a natural position so they went on and on about the poor ref and VAR error

    Caps 3 stars- Berhalter, Cubas and Ocampo who cant play defence very well, but is dangerous when on attack and better than both Nelson and Sabbi who lack any ability to actually shoot on-goal, especially Jadyn who reminds me of Darren Mattocks with no finished product, just lots of flash

    and kudos to both Utvik and Halbouni who did well as our CB pairing; and Takaoka who was sure-handed and decisive in goal

    Brian White will get back his shooting and scoring- he really should have had a pair of goals- but when a striker does get chances, the scoring will come — if we ever get Gauld back and then Ahmed returns and maybe Axel gets a suitable replacement for Vite, the Team will do well heading into the play-offs

    2 players Axel needs to find- a young MF who has some pace and shooting ability outside the box; and another experienced striker who has a nose for goal

    all-in-all, getting 4/9 points on the 3 road games was what i was hoping for (almost had 6)- the most pleasing thing for me last night is that the Team played with energy and focus again

    1. It really does no good at all for the referee to emerge from the VAR screen and announce that “there was no handball offence” when we’ve been watching the ball hit the hand for five minutes. Was it denied because the arm was in a natural position? because the position of the arm was justifiable by the action taken? A little clarity would help, including what the original call on the field actually was, and why the SD player escaped scott-free for a knee to the head. I’m all for VAR but it needs to remove mysteries, not create them.

  4. It has to be said. The referees had us in their good books early in the season but this is changing. 20-2 is indicative enough of the trend, but it was 11-2 at the half, so while SD pushed to get the goal back for most of the second, they somehow committed zero fouls in the eyes of this referee in 45+8”. Not a single one. Meanwhile, every 50-50 ball was either won by SD or called a free kick, and the game ended with Vancouver about to take a corner. One point in the circumstances is a victory. No impartial observer could possibly watch that and say Vancouver deserved 100% of the fouls in the second half. Except maybe the Apple TV+ crew, which consistently makes it seem like we’re on a road trip for the entire season…

Leave a Reply to PeterCancel reply