Report Card: A prototypical road win for the Whitecaps in San Jose

Saturday night at PayPal Park, the Vancouver Whitecaps stormed to a 2-0 win over the San Jose Earthquakes, propelled by second half substitute performances from Ali Ahmed, Alessandro Schopf, and Fafa Picault.

While this match was certainly not a perfect 90 minute showing from the Whitecaps, I think the team displayed some impressive maturity throughout. The first half was extremely low-event, and it would have been easy to fall into the trap of forcing the issue, but the Whitecaps remained composed in their defensive structure, completely neutralizing Cristian Espinoza and Jeremy Ebobisse, the only two Earthquakes who were likely to pose Vancouver serious problems.

The same could be said of early in the second half, where the Earthquakes upped the pressure, but the Whitecaps remained resolute. After the Quakes failed to score during that early second half push, it was clear that both emotionally and physically, San Jose no longer had any gas left in the tank. This is when Vancouver started to take over proceedings, with some very well timed substitutions that broke the match wide open. With the Earthquakes on the back foot, they struggled to handle Ali Ahmed and Fafa Picault’s direct and physical approach, and from there, the rest is history.

While the performance on Saturday night was certainly praiseworthy, I do think there are some sustainability concerns as to how this exact approach would play out against teams much better than San Jose. Better teams might be able to punish a reasonably static defensive posture, even if it’s just with a moment of individual brilliance. Similarly, Vancouver needs to find something more dynamic than the current front three combination (either tactically, or in terms of personnel). Overall though, the qualities the Whitecaps showed in San Jose this past weekend serve as a good baseline to build from as the Whitecaps travel down to Dallas next weekend.

Alright, on to the player ratings we go:

Yohei Takaoka – 7.0

The Japanese keeper was not terribly busy, only having to make two saves. That being said, both were quality stops which could have proved tricky if a keeper was having an off day: Espinoza tested Yohei near-post from outside the area on a free kick, and Pellegrino stung a spinning shot that was curling away from Takaoka from an obstructed angle.

Mathias Laborda – 7.0

The whole backline was very solid in this match, and it was nice to have Mathias back in the XI. Laborda’s aggressive nature, often snuffing out attacking phases before they can even start, is something this Vancouver defensive unit has been missing at times, so it was good to see him build on his Champions Cup showings.

Ranko Veselinovic – 7.5

This is the kind of match you want to see from Ranko. He was assertive in the few moments that were needed, and otherwise, he kept things organized at the back and was very sharp with his distribution.

Tristan Blackmon – 7.0

The American defender, along with Luis Martins in front of him, were impressive in the way they largely negated the impact of Cristian Espinoza. As with Ranko, Blackmon fared better on the ball in this match than he did against Charlotte, which is an important part of the way the Whitecaps want to play.

Andres Cubas – 8.5

Cubas was an absolute force in this match, as he was essential to the way the Whitecaps were able to stifle San Jose, especially in the first half. This is what you want from a DP defensive midfielder.

Pedro Vite – 7.0

Though Vancouver did not do a ton on the ball in the first 60 minutes, Vite had some silky touches and passes that really caught my attention. With the front three a bit better sorted out, Vite can have real impact as a threat in transition play for Vancouver. It’s worth noting how much his defensive play has developed as well, he’s not on a Cubas level, but he’s certainly a plus defender for Vancouver in the midfield.

Luis Martins – 7.0

While I was not a huge fan of Martins being in the starting XI for this match, I couldn’t help but like what I saw from him in his 60+ minutes. It was not glamorous, but he did the job defensively against Espinoza, and executed the gameplan perfectly. Obviously, there’s no real dynamism or attacking threat from Martins to speak of, but as long as you deploy him in the right spot, he can be a useful player to have in the squad.

Javain Brown – 6.5

Deploying Brown in a more advanced role is good in the sense that it helps avoid some of the pitfalls of his defensive game. In theory, this advanced positioning also gives Brown more of a chance to push forward and add to the attack. The problem is, while Javain does get forward and put himself in the right positions, the final product is most often lacking. I’m not really sure what the Whitecaps should do with Brown, he has some good traits, but tactically, I don’t really see the fit.

Ryan Gauld – 8.0

Though the Scotsman did not feature on the score-sheet, he was responsible for pretty much every other chance that the Whitecaps created, outside the two goals, as he recorded 5 key passes on the evening. With slightly sharper finishing from Brian White, Gauld could have very well had two assists. After a lacklustre showing last week, Vancouver’s most important player looks to be back on track.

Brian White – 6.5

White made some great runs in transition to put himself in dangerous scoring positions, but obviously you’d like to see him finish one of those chances. As mentioned last week, the combination of White and Kreilach is just not doing enough to stress opposing defensive lines at the moment, the two strikers are not getting enough touches from normal buildup play, and even when they do, it’s not often in advantageous positions.

Damir Kreilach – 6.0

Look, I don’t think what has happened to Kreilach over the first two matches is really his fault, he’s simply being asked to play in a role, and to play an amount of minutes, that does not suit him at this stage in his career. His stat line, 26 touches, 2 for 7 on ground duels, 2 for 7 on aerial duels, says it all really.

Ali Ahmed –  8.5

The young Canadian’s impact on the match was immense, particularly given his dynamism in comparison to the static nature of the match leading up to that point. While his roasting of Tommy Thompson leading to a brilliant individual goal was the highlight, there were a bunch of other nice moments in possession where Ahmed offered real threat from his wide role. Vancouver will be a different team with him in the starting XI.

Fafa Picault – 7.5

I’m still a bit curious as to why Fafa did not start, as this seemed like the perfect matchup for him. Like Ahmed, Picault offered a lot more for the San Jose defenders to stress about than they had seen up until that point, especially given their struggles defending in transition. It would be good to see what he can do in a longer stint.

Ryan Raposo – 6.5

The Canadian was solid off the bench replacing Javain Brown, though I can’t remember any particular standout moments.

Alessandro Schopf – 7.0

As mentioned on the broadcast, his first touch of the match might have been his shot from outside the area which opened the scoring for Vancouver. Although he’s not had a great time so far in Vancouver, the Austrian obviously still has a lot of quality, and he demonstrated that on the goal.

Sebastian Berhalter – NS

Michael D’Agostino & Vanni Sartini – 7.0

I’ll recycle my takes from the opening paragraphs a bit here. I thought Vancouver’s discipline sticking to their gameplan was impressive, though I wonder if it would work against better teams. I also think it’s time to try Johnson or Picault up front instead of Kreilach, nothing wrong with bringing the veteran off the bench in the 55th if you think that’s what the match needs. Overall, Vancouver has been super solid defensively so far and that’s a big credit to the work Sartini did this preseason. Equally, despite not being super sharp, Vancouver still has 3 goals though 2 matches, which is a decent offensive output. This match felt like another step in the Whitecaps’ progression, and they are already off to a better start than last year.

Alright, those were my thoughts on this past weekend in San Jose. Let me know yours in the comments!

8 thoughts on “Report Card: A prototypical road win for the Whitecaps in San Jose

  1. Loved the corner from Gauld instead of putting into the box he played it straight to Amhed outside of the box to put a shot in.

  2. It was mentioned how well Martins and Blackmon were defensively. The same was true on our right side but this was not mentioned, perhaps preferring to add weight to the statement that Brown is not a tactical fit for the Caps. Really. One reason Laborda looked so good is that he had Brown in front of him. Brown, when in a good defensive position, rarely gets beaten whether on the ground or in the air. And this makes Laborda’s game a whole lot easier. Overall, this was one of the best defensive performances in a long time and 3 at the back looked solid, with credit going to our midfield. Brown is better than Raposo in every facet of the game. The only wingback better than Brown is Ahmed, who could switch to the right. Of course Ahmed can play anywhere. He’d probably be our number one striker if given the chance. His attacking instincts are so good with the pace and skill to make it work. I don’t want to rely on boring, ultra defensive soccer throughout a match. Attack is the best defence. But we need to be able to shut down our opponents, even if we concede possession in our half and just eliminate those grade A crosses and shots that will eventually find the back of our net. Perhaps someone can delve a little deeper into why Brown is not a good fit for the Caps

    1. I think one area where Raposo is much better than Brown is with the ball at his feet in tight quarters, as well as playing quick passes. I’ll agree that Brown is very solid as a wide defender, but his attacking toolbox is quite limited. Both him and Raposo play in a lot of low percentage crosses: Raposo comes with a more diverse attacking skill-set, but Brown is better defensively. I also think shutting down Espinoza was a bigger task than shutting down Pellegrino.

      My read on Vanni is that he values the ball playing traits more than he does the defensive traits in that spot, at least on most occasions, hence my concern about the fit. Martins, despite his limitations, also adds more in possession than we see from Brown.

      1. Got to disagree and I’ll use the game against Charlotte as an example. Raposo did absolutely nothing with the ball at his feet except play back to Ranko. Well he tried to play in tight quarters and lost the ball twice, giving up a scoring chance to boot. He did get a couple of crosses off but they weren’t that dangerous as he’s not beating his opponent to the goal line to deliver. Brown came on in the 2nd half and had immediate impact with Cubas and Vite finding Brown on the right flank and Brown did well, with his pace (that Raposo doesn’t have) to beat his opponent and deliver a cross from a better position. Schopf was happy to cover for Brown, letting Brown do the attacking. I can see Raposo getting a few starts but I’ve given up on expecting him to do much. He’s more effective as a sub, once the field has opened up and then his skillset has some use. Whichever side Raposo starts on it’s going to be a problem for us defensively. Another point, Brown is better on our attacking set pieces as he gets up quite high for a player of his size. I standby what I said: Brown is better than Raposo in every facet of the game. I’ll try and use some stats going forward. I see the big problem being all the praise that Sartini has heaped on Raposo. It’s just not accurate…

      2. Raposo brings a lot of energy in the press and defensive backtracking hustle, so he is a good guy to have as a latter game sub. But as a starting wingback, regardless of right or left, he just doesn’t threaten opponents like the departed Laryea and Ahmed would: these are guys opponents need to game plan for. Raposo has had moments but isn’t a consistent threat and they need more from the wingback spots to take the offensive pressure of Gauld and White. Raposo is better as a squad guy, late game sub.

    2. You’re overrating Brown’s attacking contributions, and underrating Raposo’s relative to Brown’s. And, the assertion that Brown is “better” in every facet of the game is factually incorrect as the data proves. Disclaimer: I don’t think either is a better than average fullback / wingback, and there are significant flaws in each’s overall ability that the squad should have already moved on from. However, they’re both in the squad, so I’ll entertain the comparative.

      Examples (via Fbref, last 365 days vs Fullbacks, per 90):

      Crosses into the penalty area:
      Raposo 86th percentile / Brown 27th percentile

      Key passes
      Raposo 77th percentile / Brown 13th percentile

      xAG (Expected assisted goals)
      Raposo 91st percentile / Brown 18th percentile

      Shot creating actions
      Raposo 64th percentile / Brown 17th percentile

      Tackles
      Raposo 11th percentile / Brown 44th percentile

      Challenges lost
      Raposo 86th percentile / Brown 86 percentile

      Interceptions
      Raposo 88th percentile / Brown 51st percentile

      Blocks
      Raposo 34th percentile / Brown 59th percentile

      Tackles + Interceptions
      Raposo 39th percentile / Brown 43rd percentile

      A smattering of what I think are important metrics; clearly Raposo is far better an attacking threat than Brown, while Brown is a marginally better defender than Raposo in some aspects. If anyone fancies it, metrics on passing and possession favour Raposo significantly also, while further defensive metrics favour Brown significantly.

      Again, personally both are bang-average fullbacks and not suited to be wingbacks, but to assert that Brown is better than Raposo overall is simply untrue and cannot be substantiated beyond an opinion.

      Also, I agree that Sartini speaks too highly of Raposo and doing so is detrimental to the squad build as a replacement needs to have been acquired already (that isn’t the broken-down and also average Adekgube).

  3. Thanks for this. San Jose were definitely guilty of missing their chances in the first half, but I thought the Whitecaps played the road game very well, with substitutions making the difference. A lot of people were panicking (online) at the end of the first half for some reason.

Join the Conversation!